Picture the scene – a valley bottom, hills rising on each
side; a vast landscape stretching as far as the eye could
see; the valley floor deep in human bones; very dry bones.
In the midst a lonely figure, Ezekiel, wandering through the
desolation and hearing a voice asking “Mortal, can these
bones live?” and, with surprising confidence responding “O
Lord God, you know.” This visionary exchange opens to the
very heart of Ezekiel’s theology of Israel’s current
situation. How could a people, crushed by defeat and
deportation, weeping by the rivers of Babylon as they
recalled Zion, devoid of spiritual direction, how could his
people Israel become once more the people of God? Ezekiel
knew there could be only one way.
He was a complex character, at one and the same time priest
and prophet – roles often considered to be opposites, the
latter berating the former for their faithlessness. Ezekiel
was among those taken to Babylon in the first of two
deportations. There he experienced strange visions of winged
creatures and wheels full of eyes, described in detail in
chapter one. As prophet he condemned the wickedness of those
left behind in Jerusalem and predicted its destruction.
Commenting of the political machinations of neighbouring
states he anticipated their future downfall when God would
“gather the house of Israel and execute judgements upon all
their neighbours.”
And, notwithstanding his doom-laden earlier prophecies, by
the end of the book, and as priest, he looked forward to the
restoration of Israel, a rebuilt Temple at its heart and a
reformed liturgy expressing God’s faithfulness to a
repeatedly disobedient people. Herein lay Ezekiel’s
theological insight. In his vision Ezekiel witnessed the
coming together of the scattered bones, their being clothed
in sinews and flesh and, finally, given new life by divine
breath, “They lived and stood, a vast multitude.”
There are echoes here of God breathing life into the
lifeless human being at creation, and of the Psalmist - “O
Israel, hope in the Lord! For with the Lord there is
steadfast love.”
The exiles had suffered a triple whammy. They had lost God’s
gift of the Promised Land; they had lost the Temple in
Jerusalem, the sign of God’s presence, and their emasculated
monarchy was a far cry from God’s promise to King David and
his descendants. Parallels between Ezekiel’s vision and
Israel’s future are inescapable. The restoration of his
people was possible, not by a King, however faithful, but by
God breathing new life into Israel through the Prophetic
action of Ezekiel the Priest. This powerful allegory
demonstrates his conviction that an Israel, even as lifeless
as a valley full of very dry bones could be revived and
restored through obedience to and by the grace of God.
Breathing new life into a moribund religious and therefore
social, culture seems also to have been a central feature of
Jesus’ mission. Setting out “not to destroy the law but to
fulfil it” the picture painted by all four Gospels in that
of unswerving challenge to those in authority and of endless
compassion towards those whose lives were shrivelled by an
indifferent elite and the impossible demands of apparently
self-serving religious leaders.
But a nation that was nonetheless capable of redemption
through the grace of God. As always when reading scripture,
context, in this case John’s Gospel, is very important. Only
John includes this episode in his Jesus story and, unlike
the Synoptics, the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, for
whom the cleansing of the Temple was the pivotal moment in
Jesus’ ministry, when his opponents resolved to kill him,
John places that event at the outset of Jesus’ ministry and
instead places the account of the raising of Lazarus at the
“day on which they planned to put him to death.” It’s also
important to remember that in John’s Gospel miracles, always
referred to as “signs”, are performed in order to
demonstrate God’s glory, rather than simply in response to a
perceived need, as is the customary usage in the other three
Gospels.
The significance of this particular miracle is both in the
miracle itself and the consequences for Jesus.
But perhaps, its significance goes even further. John was
writing for a church in the latter third of the first
century. Martha’s reply to Jesus’ question “Do you believe?”
is a concise expression of the early church’s developing
understanding of Jesus’ nature and ministry; he is at one
and the same time Messiah, Son of God and Prophet, the one
coming into the world. Not that Martha would have understood
this fuller meaning, but her confession of faith was the
means for John’s later confession.
At the time of this particular miracle we are told “many…
believed in him. But some of them went to the Pharisees…”
The tantalizing question posed by John’s account was: would
the people, who saw God’s glory in the raising of Lazarus,
also be able to recognise God’s glory in the coming death
and resurrection of Jesus? Would those who believed survive
the challenge of the cross? Would their faith continue in
the new life beyond the tomb when this particular miracle
had become a graphic but fading memory?
The leaders in the early church knew the answer but in the
context of this episode, as was so often the case during
Jesus’ ministry, the crowds were divided. Once again
parallels, this time between the raising of Lazarus to new
life and the renewing of Israel and her religion, are too
obvious to have been unintentional. After Calvary, after
Pentecost, John seems to be telling his first century
readers the good news that death will not have the last word
for them as individuals nor for the faith by which they
lived.
Ezekiel’s valley of dry bones and John’s account of the
raising of Lazarus both testify to the new life that
transforming death can also revive and renew the here and
the now. And in our times we needn’t search for long before
we too are confronted by valleys of dry bones – all too
literally in places – of wars and civil unrest; of grinding
poverty and dripping wealth; of lives diminished and stunted
by social and economic systems. We too are confronted by
people waiting to hear the good news “Unbind him and let him
go.”
We need not search for long before we are confronted by the
dry bones of religions, including our own, that appear to be
concerned more about internal disputes than by a world
crying out for unambiguous expressions of God’s love for all
humankind, notwithstanding our hesitating commitment to
those ways of justice and peace so eloquently expressed in
the life and teaching of Jesus. If, with Ezekiel, we truly
believe that dry bones can indeed live, and with John that
Jesus is indeed the resurrection and the life, let us be
encouraged by today’s scripture readings coming from people
of the past, to find more and more ways in the present,
beginning in our own lives, to express that same
faith.